I was last seen on December 12, 2008 at 10:12am

Peter

Platts
Peter

My Friends

My Events

Bio

Recent Activity

Recent Forum Posts

10 messages
2008-12-12
The Burgh » What do you love about "the burgh"?

I agree MeganE !  Today the snow is wonderful and the warner temp with no wind is nice.   Just drive slow!  I agree that jobs around here are few and far inbetween.  I wonder what the Mayor is trying to do for the city.  I know the town has good tax revenue with the Mall and up that way.  We need more tourism around here.  We need something...

2008-11-20
Alternative News » Does this sound right to you?

Does this sound right to you?

Next week, the Iraqi Parliament is expected to vote on whether to approve an agreement setting the terms of the ongoing military relationship between the United States and Iraq.  So far, so good.  A legislative body, representing the people of a nation, shall determine the extent to which that nation's future will be intertwined with that of another.

Of course, one would expect that the United States Congress would be given the same opportunity.  That, however, is not the case.  Or at least it is not what the Bush administration is allowing to happen.  Shockingly, the Bush administration is not even letting Congress read the full agreement before it is signed! 

We need you to send a message immediately to U.S. House and Senate leaders, urging them to demand the constitutional input and approval to which they are entitled. 

The administration has asserted that the agreement between the U.S. and Iraq is merely a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) and therefore does not require congressional approval.  Yet the agreement goes far beyond the traditional limits of a SOFA, which typically set the terms for bringing materials and equipment into a nation and outline the legal procedures that will apply to members of the military who are accused of crimes.

Believe it or not, the current agreement contains terms that will actually give Iraq a measure of control over U.S. forces.  No foreign nation or international entity has ever been given the authority to direct U.S. forces without prior congressional approval - either through a majority vote of both chambers or a two-thirds vote in the Senate in the case of treaties.

If this agreement goes into effect without congressional approval, it will establish a precedent under which future presidents can exercise broad unilateral control over the U.S. military - and even give foreign nations control over our troops.

Congress must take immediate action.  Unfortunately, they are about to adjourn for at least a couple of weeks.  But it is not too late for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to make a statement, signaling their strong belief that Congress will not be bound by and need not fund an agreement that has not been approved by Congress.

Please send an E-mail encouraging such action to Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid immediately by clicking on the following link:

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2165/t/1027/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26268

This is truly a dire situation and we hope that you will join us in calling for action.

Thank you.

 

2008-11-06
Alternative News » Mondo Times

Mondo Times, the worldwide media guide

2008-11-02
Pipeline Projects » Nice Changes

I've love the recent changes.  Keep it up, everything is coming along just great!

2008-10-27
Alternative News » Magnets

HA COOL LINK GINA - I was stuck for the last 30 minutes making sentences.