Our founding fathers would be rolling in there graves,,,,,imagain  what they would think,,back then,,if cams were around...so many gave there lifes  to ensure  our so called rights,,one being  unresonable searches,,,,well I imagain that the term unreasonable  ,,is now the ?,,,,is it  reasonable to thunk,,that big brother is now vidoe taping  us  24/7,,also  remeber  A right to face an acusser,,,is the accusser  now not human,,but in the form  of a device  put in place by gov,,,,how do I or you,,,if accuused bye such a device ,,of voilating a law?   umm I know a police offercer can speak in a court of law,,I know humans can speack,,there fore  right to face an accusser is in place,,,but can a nonhuman ,,manmade goverment sponsered poilice moneter camra speack,,the fundamental right  to face an accusser is taken away,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,when do we draw the line,,when gov,,,can wire tap our phones  w/o a warrent,,,vidio us...all why when we are monertor in our homes cars offices ,,bedrooms,,,will we say,,,,,damm:we should never had allowed gov to install that camra on corner of north and south cathrine st,after all;       so what ya think?

Im not sure about any one eles,,,but feel qwiet uneasy about theses cams,,have we come to a point in our society where its ok to use surveilence such as this?I have nothing to hide at all , but still when we as a whole start letting bib brother do as he wants, well where does it stop?camras in our homes,cars,bedrooms,I find it hard to belive our founding fathers would have agreed with such actions from the state, as to vidoe tape any and all persons, property and on and on and on......I know that in a day and age where these cams may help solve crime to a small degree, do we give up others freedoms for such a price? when and where does this all stop?In time when big bro isnt happy w/ cams only on a few corners, what next, maybe he can implant gps chips in ever one and monetor there daily routins, we are at a time when our founding fathers relized the resons for there actions were because of a true need to freedom from absolute power of the goverment to unreasonale demands on its citezines,the lawabidding poeple pay for the ones who arent in this case, and damm the roads could certinly use the rrepair over the goverments needs to survay , monentor it people  ,,,what do u think? ,,,thanks in advance for any feed back,[,besides grammer],,,,,,

Well Matt, I have come to be aware of Mr lawless.s actions threw community friends weather they be lawerys, single moms, families, working class or white collar workers even a few county employees, Im not simply pulling out a rabbit so to say,,all I have described has been spoken words of what I can only call victims of Mr lawless,s action's do agree that some Case's require more attention and more action to protect our children .But crossing the line between protecting  and causing more damages is a fine line. He has I'm sure made many good decisions from the bench. I am thou concerned of the bad ones, which is my reasons for these post, complete unfettered power from one man has ,in this writer's opinion , has and continues to destroy some of the very same persons he is there to help, protect and serve, please thou matt,if you have a differing opinion on this lets chat about this, Im open to others veiws thanks

so now that all this has been investagete, by police dept,,,Im still wondering just what did happen on the bike path,, as kibblesandbi confermed ,,the alleged victem is a nys regester sex offendder, as i had checked on and stated im my other reponse,, I do think had he been taken off the streets when he did commit this offence which he received his sexoffender status, ,,we wouldnt ne even talking about this now,, he would have been locked up,,,and all the police work, manhours , and so forth could have been spent eleswhere,, I am a firm beliver, that once a sex offender has been caught theres only one soultion, ok 2 , but as a society the second isnt allowed under laws, get the point, the first thou,,, lockem up ,,,,,throw away the keys,,forever and ever,,,our children are our most cherished gift and need to be protected,,,ok thanks for reading and I now feel a little better  thanks all for who responded to my reponses and have a great day,,,,

Yes  that's what I am saying,,, In my opinion, yes I feel he is, family court judge main poupos ,  reunite families,,, I thought,, well this man I have heard so much of , that I needed to look into myself, many lawyers wont represent clients anymore in his court, he I believe feels that his judgement is absolute, without area, his decision , are now starting to end up in courts of appeal, children being removed from homes, placed into foster care when the circumstances don't war rent them, someone being late for an appointment at counseling ,threw in jail for 30 days, and as for the term due processes , threw out completely, guilty till proven innocent left the court house , replaced by the will of a unsympathetic, rude , pompous man, You may think I have an axe to grind hear?I do not ....I have never been in front of this man for any reason at all.My kids are now grown am sure however if I had been the judge I would be written this letter as those whom challenge him , well we wont go there now. I am glad thou this is getting some attention, I bye all means welcome and opinions  on this issue either way you believe as that's what this country is made of .OK well enough for now  Thank you Ten and please if in doubt of this issue due some investigating as I have  Thanks